> On Monday 30 August 2004 17:23, Vladimir Botka wrote: > Hi, > you did not portupgrade with the -R option (that is in the part of my > 1st email you left out). But, no problem. Portupgrade again. This > time I would I did not originally use portupgrade because the nameservers I was using beloned to an ISP who I no longer use, and he withdrew his nameservice from me. I now run my own nameserver (Which I needed to do anyway) I am used to using portupgrade where i have a port installed from the ports collection, and it fetches the appropriate distfiles. > > recommend: > > portupgrade -Rf > I tried - it reported that both old and new versions were installed, so I did pkg_delete for both, and then reinstalled the one in the ports collection, and did a portupgrade. > Try and read "man portupgrade". > I have read it - it seems to say much the same as it always did ;-) Are you suggesting I should use port upgrade to install the packages (not to do an upgrade with -Rf) ? as in portupgrade -P regards Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
