> On Saturday 21 August 2004 14:50, Jan Willamowius wrote: > I think this is what Andrew meant all along and this is very usefull > > information: > > At run time, when the missiing code is invoked, it has the error > > "Unable to create object PostGreSQL" > > [...] > > > GNUGK is clearly able to detect the error, and report it. The level > > needs to be promoted to fatal. > > Now we can check if the situation is always fatal (not sure if it is) > and the gatekeeper should halt, or if the error message just needs to > be upgrade a few levels. My complaint was that it is not fatal - thus allowing the gk to continue runnig with no logging of usage - ie users get to exploit the system for free. > > Error reports that sound like "it doesn't work, so GnuGk should > obviously detect and fixit" aren't quite as helpful. That's what > prompted my half-funny remark. > That was not the way I intended it. My complaint was that GnuGk HAD detected it, but failed to attract the operator's attention to a potentially hideously expensive accident. Furthermore, the underlying fault has been around for some time (code omitted from beta4). It is hard for me to give detailed error reports because I am unable to run the GK computer and the e-mail computer simultaneously, and have to rely on my notes. regards Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
