I do not know when we have reasons to use more than one RTP thread - if there exist any, I guess they are not obvious. Another thing are signaling threads - very often more than one is required (if you are using auth/acct). ----- Original Message ----- From: <h323@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 8:48 PM > Hello > > Good... > So please tell me when we have reasouns to split RTP load > into more then one thread in 2.2 ? At what number of simultaneous > calls ? When we can use this feature in 2.2 for performance > improvement ? > > Ivanov > > ZM> Having 30 RTP threads just to handle 30 calls is a peformace > ZM> degradation rather than improvement. I would say 1 RTP thread > ZM> for 30 calls is enough and it will give the best performance. > ZM> Remeber that RTP threads only read and forward UDP packets > ZM> - so they do not perform much work. > >> Can anybody tell me performance improvement (CPU usage) in > >> full proxy mode for default 2.0 and for 2.2 with enabled > >> separate RTP threads (sample 30 RTP threads configured in INI) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
