I'd try disabling CiscoGKCompatible option in the config (for GnuGk 2.0) or changing neighbor type to ClarentGk (for GnuGk 2.2). This disables including a dummy LRQ nonStandardData field. I don't know if it will help - just my guess. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Sykes" <Glen.Sykes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 11:50 PM > Hi Freddy, > > I have not managed to get this to work yet either. I did post something > along the lines of what you have put a while ago but no reply. > > I am looking to integrate GNUGK as a child GK to a parent Cisco GK but have > not been able to test this yet. > > However I would recommend that the Cisco GK is upgraded to 12.3(7) or (8), > for no other reason that it the more recent version supports H.323 version > 4. > > Has the GNUGK been tested for interop with Cisco GK's? > > Cheers, > > Glen > > _____ > > From: Freddy Parra [mailto:fparra@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 12 July 2004 18:33 > To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: LRJ from Cisco Gk > > > Glen, > > Thanks for your reply. I verified the following configuration with the > provider, and they say this is exactly how they have it. > > But this still does not work, it still gives LRJ and the provider also has > problems sending calls to gnugk. Just so that you know they are currently > running a Cisco Gatekeeper on a 7206 12.2(15)T5. > > Has anyone gotten a 7206 Cisco gatekeeper to work with gnugk as a neighbor? > > Freddy > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Glen Sykes > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:58 AM > To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: LRJ from Cisco Gk > > > Have you defined the GNUGK as a remote zone in the Cisco Config? > > i.e. > > "zone remote GNUGK domain.com [ip address of GNUGK]" > > also you will need to tell the cisco GK of the zone prefix associated with > the GNUGK with the command "zone prefix GNUGK 12345*" > > The text in italics indicate the H.323 name of the zone associated with the > GNUGK. > > Hope this helps, > > Glen > > _____ > > From: Freddy Parra [mailto:fparra@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 09 July 2004 16:35 > To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: openh323gk-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: LRJ from Cisco Gk > > > Hi, > > I am getting the following LRJ message from a cisco gatekeeper that I have > setup in gnugk as a neighbor gk. > > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.793 1 RasSrv.cxx(1413) GK ARQ Received > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.793 4 gkauth.cxx(473) GkAuth default check ok > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.793 3 RasSrv.cxx(2340) GK Send to > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1719 > locationRequest { > requestSeqNum = 563 > destinationInfo = 1 entries { > [0]=dialedDigits "0723#0115034112222" > } > nonStandardData = { > nonStandardIdentifier = h221NonStandard { > t35CountryCode = 181 > t35Extension = 0 > manufacturerCode = 18 > } > data = 5 octets { > 67 6e 75 67 6b gnugk > } > } > replyAddress = ipAddress { > ip = 4 octets { > xx xx xx xx .... > } > port = 1719 > } > sourceInfo = 1 entries { > [0]=h323_ID 9 characters { > 0041 0053 0035 0034 0030 0030 004d 0049 AS5400MI > 0041 A > } > } > canMapAlias = TRUE > gatekeeperIdentifier = 11 characters { > 004e 0055 004d 0049 004e 0044 0047 004b NUMINDGK > 0032 0033 0032 232 > } > canMapSrcAlias = FALSE > } > > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.794 5 RasSrv.cxx(2354) GK Sent Successful > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.794 2 RasSrv.cxx(447) GK Send LRQ to 1 neighbor(s) > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.858 2 RasSrv.cxx(2400) GK Read from > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1719 > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.858 3 RasSrv.cxx > locationReject { > requestSeqNum = 563 > rejectReason = notRegistered <<null>> > } > > 2004/07/08 16:29:30.859 3 RasSrv.cxx(2340) GK Send to > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:49799 > admissionReject { > requestSeqNum = 48921 > rejectReason = calledPartyNotRegistered <<null>> > } > > > I know that if your setting up gk to gk communication, there is no > registration needed between both gatekeepers. So the reason code doesn't > make any sense to me. Does anyone have any idea what could be the most > likely cause of getting a notRegistered LRJ message from a cisco gatekeeper. > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Freddy ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
