RE: LRJ from Cisco Gk

[Glen Sykes <Glen.Sykes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Freddy,

 

I have not managed to get this to work yet either.  I did post something along the lines of what you have put a while ago but no reply.

 

I am looking to integrate GNUGK as a child GK to a parent Cisco GK but have not been able to test this yet.

 

However I would recommend that the Cisco GK is upgraded to 12.3(7) or (8), for no other reason that it the more recent version supports H.323 version 4.

 

Has the GNUGK been tested for interop with Cisco GK's?

 

Cheers,

 

Glen

---

From: Freddy Parra [mailto:fparra@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 July 2004 18:33
To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: LRJ from Cisco Gk

Glen,

 

Thanks for your reply. I verified the following configuration with the provider, and they say this is exactly how they have it.

 

But this still does not work, it still gives LRJ and the provider also has problems sending calls to gnugk. Just so that you know they are currently running a Cisco Gatekeeper on a 7206 12.2(15)T5.

 

Has anyone gotten a 7206 Cisco gatekeeper to work with gnugk as a neighbor?

 

Freddy

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Glen Sykes
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:58 AM
To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: LRJ from Cisco Gk

Have you defined the GNUGK as a remote zone in the Cisco Config?

 

i.e.

 

"zone remote GNUGK domain.com [ip address of GNUGK]"

 

also you will need to tell the cisco GK of the zone prefix associated with the GNUGK with the command "zone prefix GNUGK 12345*"

 

The text in italics indicate the H.323 name of the zone associated with the GNUGK.

 

Hope this helps, 

 

Glen

---

From: Freddy Parra [mailto:fparra@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 July 2004 16:35
To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: openh323gk-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: LRJ from Cisco Gk

Hi,

 

I am getting the following LRJ message from a cisco gatekeeper that I have setup in gnugk as a neighbor gk.

 

2004/07/08 16:29:30.793 1       RasSrv.cxx(1413) GK ARQ Received
2004/07/08 16:29:30.793 4       gkauth.cxx(473) GkAuth default check ok
2004/07/08 16:29:30.793 3       RasSrv.cxx(2340) GK Send to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1719

locationRequest {
    requestSeqNum = 563
    destinationInfo = 1 entries {
      [0]=dialedDigits "0723#0115034112222"
    }
    nonStandardData = {
      nonStandardIdentifier = h221NonStandard {
        t35CountryCode = 181
        t35Extension = 0
        manufacturerCode = 18
      }
      data ="" 5 octets {
        67 6e 75 67 6b                                     gnugk
      }
    }
    replyAddress = ipAddress {
      ip =  4 octets {
        xx xx xx xx                                        ....
      }
      port = 1719
    }
    sourceInfo = 1 entries {
      [0]=h323_ID  9 characters {
        0041 0053 0035 0034 0030 0030 004d 0049   AS5400MI
        0041                                      A
      }
    }
    canMapAlias = TRUE
    gatekeeperIdentifier =  11 characters {
      004e 0055 004d 0049 004e 0044 0047 004b   NUMINDGK
      0032 0033 0032                            232
    }
    canMapSrcAlias = FALSE
  }

 

2004/07/08 16:29:30.794 5       RasSrv.cxx(2354) GK Sent Successful
2004/07/08 16:29:30.794 2       RasSrv.cxx(447) GK Send LRQ to 1 neighbor(s)
2004/07/08 16:29:30.858 2       RasSrv.cxx(2400) GK Read from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1719
2004/07/08 16:29:30.858 3       RasSrv.cxx

locationReject {
    requestSeqNum = 563
    rejectReason = notRegistered <<null>>
  }

 

2004/07/08 16:29:30.859 3       RasSrv.cxx(2340) GK Send to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:49799
admissionReject {
    requestSeqNum = 48921
    rejectReason = calledPartyNotRegistered <<null>>
  }

 

 

I know that if your setting up gk to gk communication, there is no registration needed between both gatekeepers. So the reason code doesn't

make any sense to me. Does anyone have any idea what could be the most likely cause of getting a notRegistered LRJ message from a cisco gatekeeper.

Thanks.

 

Regards,

 

Freddy