Did you see the LCF/Setup message in previouse post of this thread?
What trace part would procide more help? It was a recompiled version.
The configuration should be OK, because I used the same configuration
for that gatekeeper as for another Gnugk GK. Let me explain:
I tryed: gnugk -> gnugk
It worked fine, Setup was processed, call was established.
When I tryd: 3rd party gk (dont't have any info what kind) -> gnugk
I got Setup as it was post earlier (the 1st message in this thread).
The configuration was the same, just the gkid's and prefixes were
different, but the configuration was identical.
The main difference between gnugk Setup and that another GK:
gnugk has:
cryptoToken, destinationAddress
while 2nd GK didn't send these information.
As I looked for source codes, I found:
ProxyChannel.cxx
line 1220: if (H225_TransportAddress *dest = request.Process()) {
in this stage it got into else part.
Thank you in advance,
Thomas
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 12:36:46 PM, Zygmuntowicz wrote:
ZM> This is just a bad trace output (another question is why it is bad - maybe
ZM> you need to make clean and recompile everything).
ZM> I suspect the Setup message is correctly recognized and processed.
ZM> The problem is rather with configuration- maybe Routing engine
ZM> does not find a destination for the Setup message.
ZM> Thomas <thomasj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Could somebody help me with this issue?
>>Could somebody take a look for that Setup message?
>>I discovered, that this problem appears also in situation when GK1
>>sends call directly to GK2 (no LRQ/LCF, just Setup).
>>
>>Does GnuGk support H.225v4? (protocolIdentifier = 0.0.8.2250.0.4)
>>
>>I would be very happy to get some help.
>>I already looked into source codes but I wasn\'t able to
>>find/underestand the issue.
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>> Thomas
>>
>>Tuesday, March 23, 2004, 1:18:11 PM, Thomas wrote:
>>T> Tuesday, March 23, 2004, 1:31:52 AM, ray wrote:
>>r>> On Monday 22 March 2004 17:50, Thomas wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have this topology:
>>>>> GK1-> GK2 -> GK3
>>>>> Where GK2 is gnugk-2.2. GK1 and GK3\'s type is unknown.
>>>>> GK2 runs in GK routed mode (and I have access only to it).
>>>>> 1. GK1 is trying to make a call to GK2
>>>>> 2. GK2 asks GK3
>>>>> 3. GK3 responds with LCF
>>>>> 4. GK2 sends LCF to GK1
>>>>> 5. GK1 sends Q931 Setup
>>>>> 6. GK2 rejects the call.
>>
>>
>>r>> have you tried to set the hop count to 3 or 4 maybe.
>>r>> also i have these settings enables.
>>
>>r>> ForwardHopCount=3
>>r>> AcceptForwardedLRQ=1
>>r>> ForwardResponse=1
>>r>> ForwardLRQ=always
>>r>> CiscoGKCompatible=1
>>
>>T> Yes, I have thos options (ForwardHopCount=2).
>>
>>T> This problem looks me strange:
>>T> 2004/03/22 22:37:48.970 5 Routing.h(140) ROUTING
>>T> Checking policy Explicit for request `e¸a.A. CRV=507
>>T> 2004/03/22 22:37:48.970 5 Routing.h(140) ROUTING
>>T> Checking policy Internal for request `e¸a.A. CRV=507
>>T> 2004/03/22 22:37:48.970 5 Routing.h(140) ROUTING
>>T> Checking policy Neighbor for request `e¸a.A. CRV=507
>>T> From this I see that the message type was not recognised, on it\'s
>>T> place are some symbols (`e¸a.A.). I checked the sources and found,
>>T> that this is written in case the messageType variable doesn\'t match to
>>T> any of specified (e.g. Setup). From the received Setup message is
>>T> seen, that the Setup message was correct (in the meaning of the
>>T> messageType). But later somehow it went to be wrong. My feeling is
>>T> that the problem is in policy routing or before somewhere.
>>
>>T> Can anybody help me, please?
>>
>>T> Thanks in advance,
>>T> Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
