Sorry, I didn't notice that you use GWRewriteE164, not RewriteE164... So you're probably right that LRQs are not yet supported by this rewrite mechanism Thomas <thomasj@eworld.hu> wrote: >Thursday, February 12, 2004, 12:27:42 PM, Thomas wrote: > >T> Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:46:39 AM, Zygmuntowicz wrote: > >ZM>> The rewrite should work for any calls (LRQ,ARQ,Setup). >T> Oh, good! So [RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] is planned also for LRQ, just >T> doesn\'t implemented yet? (according to Norguhtar\'s answer). >T> I will try it and will see how is it in practice :) > >Well, I tryed this. Unfortunately it didn\'t work. >What I tryed: > >[Neighbor::myGK] >Host=<n1GKIP> >Dynamic=0 >SendPrefixes= >AcceptPrefixes=* > >[RasSrv::Neighbors] >n1GK=CiscoGK > >[RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] >n1GK=in=331=123#331 > >When a call came from n1GK, I got LRJ. From log: >2004/02/12 14:31:22.921 5 Routing.h(117) ROUTING Checking policy Internal for the request LRQ 151 >2004/02/12 14:31:22.921 5 Routing.h(117) ROUTING Checking policy Neighbor for the request LRQ 151 >2004/02/12 14:31:22.921 2 RasSrv.cxx(347) LRJ|<n1GKIP>|33123:dialedDigits|n1GK|requestDenied; >So the number wasn\'t rewritten by n1GK=in=331=123#331 rule. > >Thanks in advance, > Thomas > >ps: whenever I put into 331=123#331 [RasSrv::RewriteE164] section I get LCF. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
