Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:46:39 AM, Zygmuntowicz wrote:
ZM> The rewrite should work for any calls (LRQ,ARQ,Setup).
Oh, good! So [RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] is planned also for LRQ, just
doesn't implemented yet? (according to Norguhtar's answer).
I will try it and will see how is it in practice :)
ZM> For child gatekeepers there is a second rewrite step
ZM> taken from Endpoint::RewriteE164 - applied after RasSrv::RewriteE164.
I was a little bit confused with those 3 rewriting rules, now it's
clear for me.
Thanks,
Thomas
ps.: I'm playing with gnugk-2.2 from CVS (pwlib-1.5.3,
openh323-1.12.3)
ZM> ----- Original Message -----
ZM> From: "Thomas" <thomasj@eworld.hu>
ZM> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:32 AM
>>
>> Thursday, February 12, 2004, 5:37:22 AM, Norguhtar wrote:
>>
>> >> From this it is my underestanding is that it applies only for gateways
>> >> - registered or permanent.
>>
>> N> Yes. You can't called an other's points via terminal.
>> So, does it mean it won't work? (I'm not a native English speaker,
>> can't underestant what did you want to say)
>> If it is not possible, does anybody work on the same feture for calls
>> coming from/to neighbour gatekeepers? Why is it only for gateways?
>> Another question: are child gatekeepers handled as gateways in this
>> section? Does this feature apply also for child gatekeepers?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
