Re: Re: ProxyForSameNAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It means the question is variant N 2
But you see it will not work, at least without another H323 proxy
on NAT box!
You, certainly, better know codes, but I thought this parameter was entered 
for other situation: to anable or to disable proxy on exchanging between boxes
in the same LAN, GNUGK on NAT box, both LAN (NATed) endpoints works with 
public in proxy mode.
Live and learn!
Igor.

On 8 Январь 2004 13:14, Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote:
> I meant a situation like this:
>
> two endpoints (192.168.1.10,192.168.1.11) in a private LAN
> (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0) connected to the public IP network through some
> NAT box (let's say it has two interfaces: 192.168.1.1 - private,
> 213.213.213.213 - public)
> gnugk running on a machine in front of NAT - withing public IP network -
> let's say 217.217.217.217.
>
> A--\
>       NATBOX-----GNUGK
> B--/
>
> ProxyForSameNAT=1 should enable both endpoints to communicate to each other
> (assuming the endpoints support some kind of CitronProxy for signaling).
> But it is not working - at least in my opinion it does not have any chance
> to do so. The reason is simple - GNUGK cannot determine the source of audio
> udp packets - whether it is ep A or ep B, because both have the same IP. As
> a conclusion, it seems that ProxyForSameNAT is useless. Unless I missed
> something. Any opinions?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kompnet" <kompnet@aaanet.ru>
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:59 AM
>
>
> In this point, please, more in detail!
> What does it mean "IN FRONT of NAT"?
> What does it mean "Some machine with public IP, not the one that does NAT"?
> Does it mean "The hole in the FierWall"?
> Or does it mean "Not the same LAN machine"?
> Probably there is still more interpretations, but they do not occur to me.
> Igor.
>
> On 7 Январь 2004 18:24, Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote:
> > ProxyForSameNAT and ProxyForNAT have no effect if the gatekeeper
> > is running ON NAT box (e.g. has access to both public and private
> > networks). Proxy Enable option is for such situation.
> >
> > I asked about someone that has endpoints behind NAT and the gatekeeper
> > IN FRONT of NAT (some machine with public IP, not the one that does NAT).
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
> Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> _______________________________________________
> List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id┘49
> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

-- 
С уважением,
Прохоров Игорь


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id┘49
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux