It is difficult for me to judge, whose workaround is better and easier, yours or mr Ivanov. Probable workaround is welcomed by anyone. Igor. В письме от 7 Январь 2004 14:21 Zygmuntowicz Michal написал: > I found a quick workaround for your problem (until it is solved in a better > way). The subsequent Setups have the same callIdentifiers, but different > CRVs. We could insert such calls in front of the call table, so the old > ones can be deleted later without any harm. > If you are interested, I could send you a small patch for the current 2.0.7 > cvs sources. > > --- > Michal Zygmuntowicz > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id┘49 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
