Unfortunatelly, it appeared that the workaround would be not so simple:( ----- Original Message ----- From: <h323@ke.kiev.ua> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:41 PM > ZM> I found a quick workaround for your problem (until it is solved in a better way). > ZM> The subsequent Setups have the same callIdentifiers, but different CRVs. > ZM> We could insert such calls in front of the call table, so the old ones can be deleted > ZM> later without any harm. > ZM> If you are interested, I could send you a small patch for the current 2.0.7 cvs sources. > > Please do it... > > What do think about changing "while" in ProxyHandleThread::RemoveSockets() > from "while ((ti != removedTime.end())&& ((now - **ti) > 5*1000)" > into "while (ti != removedTime.end()" with removed check for > 5 sec delay. > > I was check it and look like it work without this time delay. > Anybody see any hidden problems to remove this time delay ? > > Ivanov ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
