Craig, do you know comlete algorithm of CallID forming? Or do you know, from where does orig GW know correspondent's MAC? Or does CISCO corp. know and remember about this rules? (Situations like this I saw very many times, and firstly was surprised too). Anyhow socket should be removed. Am I not right? В письме от 12 Декабрь 2003 15:47 вы написали: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:07:18 +0300 > > Kompnet <kompnet@aaanet.ru> wrote: > > As far as I know the call identifier is unique only for calls, which was > > established at the same time interval. > > This is not true. > > A correctly formed call identifier is a Globally Unique ID, which > contains both the MAC address of the creating endpoint (which should be > unique) and a timestamp. The timestamp is accurate to the nearest > milliseond (IIRC), but contains a tie-breaker to ensure it should > *always* be unique. > > Craig > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Craig Southeren, craigs@postincrement.com http://www.postincrement.com > Post Increment - Software, Consulting and Services > Co-founder of the only open source H.323 project > Phone: +61 2 43654666 Fax: +61 2 43673140 Mobile: +61 417 231046 > ICQ: #86852844 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com > GnuPG Public Key: http://www.postincrement.com/pgp.txt > Blog: http://users.tpg.com.au/adsl87w7/blog/ -- С уважением, Прохоров Игорь ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&opлk _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id┘49 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
