On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:59:50 +0000 "Andrew Croch" <o_engenheiro71@hotmail.com> wrote: > Just one more thing related to the RAS failure email that I just posted. > The ATA is sending the gatekeeperRequest with Source port: 1739 > The gnugk is sending the gatekeeperConfirm to the ATA, to Destination port: > 1739 > > Do you think this may be the problem ? > > I was expecting to have port 1719 as the source port from the ATA. The gatekeeper can be assumed to use port 1719 (the well known port), unless the client and server are configured otherwise. The client can use whatever UDP port it likes to send RAS requests. Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren, craigs@postincrement.com http://www.postincrement.com Post Increment - Software, Consulting and Services Co-founder of the only open source H.323 project Phone: +61 2 43654666 Fax: +61 2 43673140 Mobile: +61 417 231046 ICQ: #86852844 MSN: craig_southeren@hotmail.com PGP Key: http://www.postincrement.com/pgp.txt Blog: http://users.tpg.com.au/adsl87w7/blog/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
