I am using Welltech terminals, such as LP201, WT1501 and WT3502A and an AddPac AP200, while testing a transfercall I have still some questions about the transfercall feature. Anybody who can help me to find the right standards documentation? (see below) 1.Only the LP201 tries to setup the second connection and this request is rejected by the gatekeeper. May be because the destination has 0000 as dialed digits. Is there a special setting in the .ini file by which means gnugk accepts ARQ with an alias as destination and ignores the dialed digits as destination? 2. Further it seems that the transfercall can only be done on the original destination of a call. So....if A calls B, then only B can transferred to C. Is this designed like this? 3. At last I got lost in the documentation of standards. Where can I find the prescribed behavior of this service in terms of the data units as I see them with ethereal? Q.932 is describing the generic protocol for all ISDN supplementary feat ures. So....implementing this doesn't say so much about the implemented features. The real services seem to be described in the Q.95x.y range of ITU documents. Q.952.7 seems to be relevant (Explict Call Transfer), However....nowhere in the H.323 or H.225 documentation I can find any reference to this. I found relevant Facility messages in ETSI standard, which seem to cover exactly the same as the ITU documents. For instance IEC11582 seems to map to Q.932. And....to make the confusion complete....the H.450.2 (Call Transfer) document is referring to a description is such an ETSI document (IEC13865). However....there I found used facility messages such as CTInitiate. Nowhere I found a reference to a facility message with the name AlternativeAliasAddress. Dirk Los -----Original Message----- From: Jan Willamowius [SMTP:jan@willamowius.de] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:23 PM To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: CTI development It does work as a call transfer with many endpoints where endpoint A establishes a new connection with endpoint B. Try OpenPhone or ohphone. EnVision (Radvision H.323 stack) also works. What endpoints are you using ? dirk los wrote: > I tried the tranfercall command at the status port: > > Transfercall AiasA AliasC > > At that moment AliasA was connected to AliasB > > The following happened: > Gnugk sent a Facility message (6) "alternativeAliasAdress" to > terminal AliasA > The facility reason is set to: "callForwarded" > The "maintainConnection" parameter is set to False. > > The effect is that AliasA sends a callRelease etc. > > I have the feeling that this facility message is meant to provide > AliasA with the information that AliasB was forwarding the call. > So.....I don't think that this is really a TransferCall. > Even if the maintainConnection parameter would be set to True, then > the only effect would be that AliasA knows that is talking in reality > with AliasC. And this isn't the case because nothing changed in the > call actually. > > Can anybody tell me what was the idea behind this? > > Dirk > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Willamowius [SMTP:jan@willamowius.de] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:50 PM > To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: CTI development > > Since you are listening to the status port anyway, you can act on the > DCF message. I'm not quite sure what state the call is in when the new > destination doesn't answer. Maybe it is possible to do a 2nd transfer, > but I haven't tried. > > Virtual queues are only used on ARQ. > > dirk los wrote: > > Thanks Jan, > > > > It looks fine to me, I will try. > > Do you know if it is possible to enter the virtual queue when a Call > > Release is passing in the Gkrouted mode? Then I will be very happy. > > I have to have such a trigger for the TransferCall functionality. > > > > The scenario would be something like this: > > Alias A calls Alias B > > Alias B doesn't answer or is busy; B releases the call > > It triggers a virtual queue message > > TransferCall AliasA AliasC (should remove the call from the > > virttual queue or this should be done explicitly) > > > > Kind regards > > Dirk -- Jan Willamowius, jan@willamowius.de, http://www.willamowius.de/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
