> > The major goal of 2.2 was a rewrite of single threaded RasServer. Do you > > remember PendingList and Co. ;))) Proxy part was not affected (and we do > > discuss this part, not RAS). > > So, despite removing the need for PendingLists and Co;), there was no > reason to do multithreaded RAS? This is another question... I don't use RAS and can't say nothing about it performance/stability... Andrey. > > --- > Michal Zygmuntowicz ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
