Re: Re: Rewriting E164 numbers after GW selection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oleg,

Could you demonstrate how do you see such a configuration in e.g. terms of 
configuration file options?

Andrey.
 
> Hi Ian, Hi Michal,
> I've ask before about writing some tech-prefix configuration parameter in a
> GW config.
> Basically we need to define it in additional to normal prefixes - because
> some Telco uses tech-prefix as additional authentication. If we can deploy
> this we do not need this new rewrite rules.
> Is it correct Ian?
> 
> regards,
> oleg
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openh323gk-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Ian
> Campbell
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: 'openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject:  Re: Rewriting E164 numbers after GW
> selection
> 
> 
> The major reason would be flexibility and to ease configuration on gateways
> that may not be under our control.
> 
> An example of this is where I want to use different prefixes to select
> different gateways to exit a call (the call may be to a 0044 number) from
> the IP network; prefixes are pushed on earlier by a TDM switch as part of a
> routing plan (call now 1010044...). I would then setup GNUgk to send the
> call to the appropriate endpoint:
> 
> [RasSrv::GWPrefixes]
> GW1=100
> GW2=101
> 
> I would then like to strip the prefix from the number that is then sent to
> the gateway selected, so the gateway receives the number as was originally
> dialled (as 0044... again).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ian Campbell
> 
> 
> From: Zygmuntowicz Michal <m@on...>
> 2003-11-05 04:41
> 
>  And what could be the reason for such rewrite?
> 
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@ba...>
>  Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:08 PM
> 
> 
>  > As far as I understand the current rewriting of E164 numbers as
>  > specified in the [RasSrv::RewriteE164] section is performed prior to the
>  > gateway (endpoint) selection. Is there currently any way of rewriting the
>  > E164 number after the selection has been performed? If not, would it be
> OK
>  > if I added it?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux