Oleg, I have heard of people doing this kind of thing, however it is slightly different from the case I had in mind. But it would seem that a sensible solution to the problem I have described should allow the problem you have described to be solved as well; though I want to remove digits from the number there is no reason why you couldn't add a prefix (the authentication tech prefix) as well. Does anybody have any other opinions on whether this is the right thing? Regards, Ian From: Oleg Ustinov <Oleg@ne...> RE: Re: Rewriting E164 numbers after GW selection 2003-11-05 07:11 Hi Ian, Hi Michal, I've ask before about writing some tech-prefix configuration parameter in a GW config. Basically we need to define it in additional to normal prefixes - because some Telco uses tech-prefix as additional authentication. If we can deploy this we do not need this new rewrite rules. Is it correct Ian? regards, oleg -----Original Message----- From: openh323gk-users-admin@li... [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@li...]On Behalf Of Ian Campbell Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:10 PM To: 'openh323gk-users@li...' Subject: Re: Rewriting E164 numbers after GW selection The major reason would be flexibility and to ease configuration on gateways that may not be under our control. An example of this is where I want to use different prefixes to select different gateways to exit a call (the call may be to a 0044 number) from the IP network; prefixes are pushed on earlier by a TDM switch as part of a routing plan (call now 1010044...). I would then setup GNUgk to send the call to the appropriate endpoint: [RasSrv::GWPrefixes] GW1=100 GW2=101 I would then like to strip the prefix from the number that is then sent to the gateway selected, so the gateway receives the number as was originally dialled (as 0044... again). Regards, Ian Campbell From: Zygmuntowicz Michal <m@on...> 2003-11-05 04:41 And what could be the reason for such rewrite? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@ba...> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:08 PM > As far as I understand the current rewriting of E164 numbers as > specified in the [RasSrv::RewriteE164] section is performed prior to the > gateway (endpoint) selection. Is there currently any way of rewriting the > E164 number after the selection has been performed? If not, would it be OK > if I added it? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
