--- Zygmuntowicz Michal <m.zygmuntowicz@onet.pl> wrote: > I hoped that -frepo is the option we search for, but > it has two drawbacks: > *) much longer linking time, Not really a problem... Do people want the executable or don't they? And how many times will they build it? They can leave it building overnight if necessary. > *) does not solve the problem for all > compilers/configurations. Yes, this *is* a problem. I strongly suspect that you're using g++ < 3. However, the solution for g++ 2.x is explicit template instantiation, and that's NASTY. For example, in your case you would need a file like this one for every symbol missing from your link: #include <list> #include <string> using std::list; using std::string; typedef list<string> LIST; template void LIST::_Base::clear(); This file instantiates the template function: std::_List_base<std::string, std::allocator<std::string> >::clear() which has the mangled name of: _ZNSt10_List_baseISsSaISsEE5clearEv Bleugh! But it does work. The idea here is that you'd get -frepo to do most of the work, and then you'd fill in the missing pieces. And STRONGLY suggest upgrading their GNU compiler ;-). Chris ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
