Re: fdlibm patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 19:26 +0200, Robert Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
> the OE guys still keep this little patch. Does anyone know if it is
> correct and should be applied?

Hmm, maybe Michael knows...

> --- classpath/native/fdlibm/ieeefp.h.orig       2006-04-14
> 22:33:09.000000000 -0400
> +++ classpath/native/fdlibm/ieeefp.h    2006-04-14 22:41:46.000000000
> -0400
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>     byte ordering was big or little endian depending upon the
> target.  
>     Modern floating-point formats are naturally ordered; in this case
>     __VFP_FP__ will be defined, even if soft-float.  */
> -#ifdef __VFP_FP__
> +#ifdef __SOFTFP__
>  #ifdef __ARMEL__
>  #define __IEEE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>  #else

- twisti


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux