Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
From: Chris Burdess <dog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:52:26 +0100
Cc: Robert Schuster <theBohemian@xxxxxxx>, GNU Classpath <classpath@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <18097.60716.38059.190166@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Schuster <theBohemian@xxxxxxx>, GNU Classpath <classpath@xxxxxxx>
References: <46B1EB35.2090400@xxxxxxx> <18097.60716.38059.190166@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Andrew Haley wrote:
> From my POV, the first priority is a fully free OpenJDK, running on
> all the platforms we care about.  We have only Classpath code into
> IcedTea where there are missing parts of OpenJDK.

And what platforms /do/ we care about?
-- 
Chris Burdess

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
  - From: Robert Schuster
- Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Prev by Date: Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
Next by Date: Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
Previous by thread: Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
Next by thread: Re: IcedTea - Where is this going to head?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development]

Powered by Linux