On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 12:00 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:47 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > Great news Mark! What's the plan for the generics branch? From this, > > it sounds like we keep it around until the release itself, which seems > > sensible (so we have a 0.93 generics release). > > Yes that is a good plan. And if everything goes right then that will be > till Monday at the latest. > > > I guess after that it > > gets synchronized with HEAD again, and then the updated branch becomes > > HEAD (after creating a 1.4 branch). Does that sound about right? > > I don't believe you can 'switch' a branch to become the trunk with CVS. > So after the resync with HEAD we need to actually merge the > generics-branch changes onto the trunk (which should be "just" one big > diff because they just got synced, but watch out for those added/removed > files). > Yes, when I said 'switch' I was referring to the effective result afterwards, rather than the hackery we will have to go through with CVS :) > Cheers, > > Mark > -- Andrew :-) Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
