Mark Wielaard writes: > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:47 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > Great news Mark! What's the plan for the generics branch? From this, > > it sounds like we keep it around until the release itself, which seems > > sensible (so we have a 0.93 generics release). > > Yes that is a good plan. And if everything goes right then that will be > till Monday at the latest. > > > I guess after that it > > gets synchronized with HEAD again, and then the updated branch becomes > > HEAD (after creating a 1.4 branch). Does that sound about right? > > I don't believe you can 'switch' a branch to become the trunk with CVS. > So after the resync with HEAD we need to actually merge the > generics-branch changes onto the trunk (which should be "just" one big > diff because they just got synced, but watch out for those added/removed > files). OK. I'd like to have a "semi-official" 0.93 generics release for gcj. If we have that then gcj can go to Java 5 at the end of next week (i.e. we'll merge gcj-eclipse branch to trunk.) Andrew.
