Andrew Haley wrote:
Having gcj depend not only on ASM but also on a *specific version* of ASM is intolerable. If gnu.bytecode will do the job, we should use it.
While gnu.bytecode (along with gnu.math) has been fairly stable for quite a while, and it probably has been the most stable part of Kawa, I have not guaranteed backward compatibility in the past. Of course if other projects start depending on gnu.bytecode, I'll try to not break things! One bonus of using gnu.bytecode: the class gnu.bytecode.dump is a direct clone on jcf-dump. (However, it doesn't have all the features of jcf-dump, and jcf-dump is fast and compact.) -- --Per Bothner per@xxxxxxxxxxx http://per.bothner.com/
