Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2006, at 03:38, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > >> So, if we assume for a second that Sun can use the license as a carrot >> rather than a stick, my suggestion would be to use the simplest and more >> compatible license possible. >> >> I'll bite: the MIT license. > > Thanks, Stefano, I appreciate the rationale and the time and thought > that's gone into writing it. I'll make sure this outlook is represented. Simon, Thank you. -- Stefano.
