Hi Sven, Audrius, Thanks for the advice! I also saw some repainting issues which needs to be fixed. Is there a copyright assignment I have to submit before I start? In the meantime I will probably have a lot of code reading to do ;) David Fu. > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:06 +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi Audrius, >> Ok! I am trying the CVS version, and it looks like some attributes for >> the >> html tags are not working yet. But it is still cool to be able to see it >> in action ;) Is there a good starting point I can work from? >> David >> Fu. > > Hi David, This is great. There's all the work you could possibly want in > the HTML department :) Where to start depends entirely on your own > preferences, like what you're interested in, what you're familiar with > and what your personal style of hacking is. > > You could start with some small unimplemented thing and fix that, or you > could grab a bug (there are lots to choose from in the text/HTML > department) and try to fix it. Or you could just take an arbitrary class > and just test it, debug it and complete it. (The swing.text and > swing.text.HTML stuff is still pretty immature code, so chances are > you'll find something to improve on in most classes.) > > But to give a more concrete example, I implemented MinimalHTMLWriter a > while back, and tested it against the JDK, where it seems to work pretty > much as it's supposed to. It doesn't work right on Classpath though, > because of bugs in the AbstractWriter super-class. So you could fix > that class up, make sure it's all working the way it's supposed to be. > > This shouldn't be so bad since you can use the MinimalHTMLWriter to > test it and be pretty sure that part works. (I can send you a demo > if you want) > > /Sven > > > >