On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 10:35 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > Based on your comments, it seems you agree with my original intuition > of making this a native VM call (by default) in the majority of > cases, but > efficiency would seem to be fairly VM specific. > > I suppose I was aiming on lightening the load on the VM interface, as > I seem to be throwing tons down there lately. I'd be interested in > comments > from other VM coders as to what they feel is best. For me it seems to be the better way to do this in the VM itself. Although I'm not sure when I have to set which state :-) Enlighten me! TWISTI
