Andrew John Hughes wrote: > From the above e-mail, it looks as if gcj will shortly be linking in > ecj as its front end. With this, gcj will be able to handle 1.5 constructs. > What do people think of now beginning the merge of the generics branch > back on to HEAD? If the ability to compile it is there, I'm all for it. I see no reason to keep them off of HEAD as long as gcj can compile them. -- Morgon Kanter <morgon@xxxxxxxxx> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 481 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/attachments/20060602/ae589285/attachment.pgp
