I make this to a general discussion. >> Agreed, and I think we should replace existing NSA code with the >> simpler long field approach. Ideally we could remove the NSA >> implementation altogether. I'd also like to see >> Pointer/Pointer32/Pointer64 gone but they seem to be used in places >> other than the peers. Does that mean we simply store any native pointer as long in some field of a class? If so, do we use JNI to set/get the fields or do we go the simpler way provide necessary pointers via argument list? I vote for the second approach because I dislike nothing but these tedious JNI findClass, get fieldID and set field function stuff. > I should have said: Robert: go ahead and commit your NSA-using patch > when it's ready -- I don't want to delay it. After it's committed we > can look at replacing all NSA code in one big patch. Ok. cya Robert -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/attachments/20060523/a5343741/signature.pgp
