Hi, Only OSGi members can have the TCK. You already pass our internal suite. We need to produce reproducers or something. Then have a VM, Classpath mutlidimensional matrix with versions, arch, and GUI-toolkits. At this point testing and configuring is much more convenient for us. We have our eyes on the Classpath AWT as a CDC OSGi core framework component. GTK+ support is vital to us as it means pre-integration into the Maemo environment. I'd personally like to see the Biss-TVT AWT rescucitated. The thing draws on the Linux frame buffer without GTK. This is great for embedded. Does everyone know where that code is? Is there a licensing hurdle here? Best Regards, -- Philippe Laporte Software Gatespace Telematics F?rsta L?nggatan 18 41328 G?teborg Sweden Phone: +46 702 04 35 11 Fax: +46 31 24 16 50 Email: philippe.laporte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>"Philippe" == Philippe Laporte <philippe.laporte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> > >Philippe> We are currently looking into how to best communicate to you >Philippe> the results of our OSGi TCK runs with Knopflerfish, >Philippe> Classpath and various VMs. > >How about: get the results down to a manageable number (zero :-) by >hand, then auto-report regressions? > >The first step would involve investigating the failures by hand and >filing bug reports. If there are enough bugs we could have a meta-bug >for these, or something like that, so that people can easily know the >status of the project. > >The second step would involve having an auto-tester which sends out >email whenever there is a regression. (Perhaps if the regression is >only seen on one VM, the email could be sent only to that VM's list?) >If Knopflerfish and its TCK are easy to get, we could run this as >part of the automatic build on builder.classpath.org. > >Tom > >