Stax API - JWSDP vs JSR173

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Burdess wrote:
>> the current Stax API in classpath is JWSDP compliant. I am  
>> currently about to
>> package dom4j for debian and found that the Stax part is not  
>> compiling against
>> GNU classpath because of some missing methods.
>>
>> Is there anything preventing the support of the JSR173 API. This  
>> looks like
>> it only has some additional methods. It also seems that SUN will  
>> include the
>> JSR173 API in java 1.6.
>
> There was some discussion about this a while ago and it was decided  
> to match the JWSDK API specification instead of JSR173 as more real  
> world applications appeared to target

... the JWSDK API. The JSR173 methods are simply commented out in the  
code, so if/when JSR173 becomes the standard, it will be trivial for  
us to match it.
-- 
? Chris Burdess
   "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety
   deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/attachments/20060213/2b74f015/PGP.pgp

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux