Stax API - JWSDP vs JSR173

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chris,

Chris Burdess wrote:
> Chris Burdess wrote:
> 
>>> the current Stax API in classpath is JWSDP compliant. I am  currently
>>> about to
>>> package dom4j for debian and found that the Stax part is not 
>>> compiling against
>>> GNU classpath because of some missing methods.
>>>
>>> Is there anything preventing the support of the JSR173 API. This 
>>> looks like
>>> it only has some additional methods. It also seems that SUN will 
>>> include the
>>> JSR173 API in java 1.6.
>>
>>
>> There was some discussion about this a while ago and it was decided 
>> to match the JWSDK API specification instead of JSR173 as more real 
>> world applications appeared to target

Yes, I remember this discussion.
> 
> ... the JWSDK API. The JSR173 methods are simply commented out in the 
> code, so if/when JSR173 becomes the standard, it will be trivial for  us
> to match it.

So would it be possible to support both API's as of now in our implementation ?

It would be nice if we could get dom4j running also on gnu classpath with
its stax backend.

Wolfgang


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux