On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:59:49PM +0100, Roman Kennke wrote: > Hi again, > > Am Dienstag, den 24.01.2006, 10:53 +0100 schrieb Roman Kennke: > > Hi there, > > > > > But in general, I do not appreciate what Aicas has been doing nor do > > > I find it valuable. All I see this work doing is making Classpath's > > > native implementation of things less and less maintainable, with a > > > benefit that is utterly unclear to me. > > > > > I vote that they stop changing the native libraries of Classpath > > > immediately, > > > > Aye. We will do so. Please feel free to revert the native code to the > > state of the 0.20 release. > > I would help and revert the native code to the state that we had a week > or so ago (0.20 release) if that is generally appreciated. Please say so > if I should, or if you think I should not. > I think that would be fine, given that it probably makes no sense for you to maintain your contributions to the native layer in GNU Classpath, once the target layer macros are purged. Reverting it all back to 0.20 gives people interested in working on GNU-ifying the native code a clean, working state to start from. cheers, dalibor topic
