On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 14:01 +0200, Les Paul wrote: > 2013/4/2 Shaun McCance <shaunm@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Can you elaborate on how you think the help could be improved? > Of course. As I see, "Settings" and "Help" are both required. But they > are barely used. Eh? What metric tells you these are "barely used"? > So you could move this options to a general Settings > and Help Application, respectively. I think this way is even more > intuitive. I need help and I have and application called "Help". I > need to set up something and I have an application called Settings. No, seems far far less intuitive to me. I am in the application - why can't I just adjust the settings there? I'm already there. Why do I need to go to something else? And if I open Help from an application -> I get the help FOR THAT APPLICATION! This seems like modularization for the sake of modularization. And breaks the flow of using GNOME apps vs. non-GNOME apps - which will not follow the convention and the settings app will be oblivious to them. And if I develop that an app I want to work on GNOME, it won't follow that convention if I also want it to work on any other platform / environment. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
