>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Petri Kanerva" (petri.kanerva@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: ---------- Yea right.... I have used it. But it seems you don't even get the point of my sentences. You just thor hostile commentary instead of constructive comments. And no, it seems that winRAR enven now, dosn't represent the archive contents in a hierarchial manner as File-Roller does. I think WinACE is only windows archiver to provide this very useful function. Well, if WinRAR is so much better, why don't you then just stick using it and stop bothering us with your hostile mails? And to the point of using commanline software for the actual job, we have fully working programs that do their respective jobs quite well. Programs that are still developed and that are getting new functions and such all the time. So, why should we recode the same fuction again? We would always be a few steps after the commanline versions, as they have started earlier. And then we just would waste harddisk space to two codes that do exactly the same thing. Why re-invent the wheel.... And please, if you still reply to this, try to make even one valid, constructive point, will ya? Petri <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< I apologize, though, I don't now for why! 1- I didn't understand you again! Can somebody examine WinRAR 3.3 and have a judgement? Or can you explain more about what you see in file-roller which can't be seen in WinRAR? 2- This may be because I am not a programmer and accept my excuse in advance: If the source of "tar" command be available, You can add an option within the codes, forcing it to announce the size of the files have been extracted... Now, a simple dividing calculation can make an estimation of the progress. You don't have to re-invent the wheel! 3- I can use WinRAR inside Linux very well thanks to "wine". But it requires that both Windows and wine be installed in the system. In addition, I like linux applications be as powerful or more than Windows ones. Once, I asked "Eugene Roshal" to make a Linux GUI version of RAR, and he answered that linux users are more convenient with command prompt; Do you confirm? 4- Please don't use the word "hostile"! I feel friendly and don't want to bother anyone. Perhaps, sometimes, I feel that improvements in linux are not as accelerated as I expect!! As a newcomer to the list, I accept if you say "shut up". Best regards, Bahram Alinezhad, Tehran, Iran. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
