On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 16:01, Matthew S. Rinehart wrote: > I think the argument basically boils down to this: > > The users that DO NOT care about package organization have nothing to > lose and nothing to gain from dividing Gnome into subcategories. > > The users that DO care about package organization gain a better > organizational structure for customizing their systems as finely as they > wish. > > Neither group has anything to lose from doing it, so why not? Actually, you missed out a group. The developers who benefit because (as you put it)... > By separating the parts of Gnome into separate categories and having > each category have its own manager, the development process might > become more efficient. I think that's what Charles meant. Although I'd cite that the process being more efficient would be one of several benefits of such an organisational change. :) - Charlie -- Charles Goodwin <charlie@xxxxxxx> XWT Foundation - www.xwt.org _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list