On 13/02/2022 08:12, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote:
A nice passive-aggressive comment from a @redhat.com
<http://redhat.com>. Kind of proves my point.
man.. a friendly advice in a form of my five cents - just move on...
We still have great open source for free - as to free to use - and as we
use it we can contribute back.
CentOS ? - nothing wrong with that nor with what Redhat did with it - if
anything that's a change for the better as Redhat put own resources &
manpower into CentOS now. One very palpable example is RH's Bugzilla
which now I can go I file a BZ against CentOS, all nicely centralized
and with more focus.
Some moaning & whining I hear from some guys(& friends) I work with,
reminds me systemd "outrage" - being upset not entirely sure what about
and now after a few years - today - having issues admitting it was
child-like frolics. (and that systemd might be one the best few things
which recently happened to Linux)
We have Alma & Rocky and more those which are less of a sibling to RHEL,
to choose from - I believe CentOS is best way forward so I'm staying on
it, as each one will make own, perhaps different choice.
best wishes, L.
________
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
