Il 2022-01-23 06:37 Sam ha scritto:
Hello Everyone,
I am just starting up with Gluster so pardon my ignorance if I am
doing something incorrectly. In order to test the efficiency of
GlusterFS, I wanted to compare its performance with the native file
system on which it resides and thus I kept both gluster server &
client on localhost to discount the role of network.
Hi Sam,
in short, yes: Gluster commands a severe performance penalty. While you
can recover some of it via tuning, comparing it to a native filesystem
is going to show bad results.
For more information, please read the thread here (where I discussed the
very same issue):
https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2020-January/037601.html
This in no way means Gluster is bad. Rather, it a specific product with
its specific use cases and expected workloads.
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
________
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
