Re: Gluster performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Changing the parameters the performance doesn't improve much.
Did you try with different server/client threads ?

>Maybe for smaller installations is better to use NFS? When you don't need to scale out or get high availability.
True. Gluster is quite suitable for hyperconverged setups.

>I don't know how to make a real world workload test.
Test with the actual workload like running the application in the VM instead of using 'dd', 'fio' or other tools.

Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov

________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux