Re: about performance of different type volume .

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Officially only replica type is "supported".
You can pick 'replica 3' or if your network is limited 'replica 3 arbiter 1'.
The second type has only 2 copies of your data, which saves network bandwidth (only syncing to the other data brick), but also limits the reading speed (as you can only read locally or from the other data brick).

For performance, replica volumes are fastest, but you waste more space.


Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov

On Jan 20, 2021 11:19, tommy <sz_cuitao@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, every one:

 

I want to know what type volume’s performance is best and what’s type is worst ?

 

Is there some construction about it ?

 

Thanks.

 

 


________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux