Re: Thin Arbiter (was Gluster 7 or 8?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



well, that is why I was asking.

Yes, we are extremely satisfied with the existing arbiter. It makes a measurable difference vs true Replica 3.

I was curious as to if Thin Arbiter was an *improvement* over regular Arbiter or even considered the new 'Arbiter' going forward.

The documentation indicates that Thin Arbiter is faster because we aren't waiting for the arbiter write to complete during full quorum ops.

However the doc's dont indicate if there is a safety cost over traditional arbiter, nor does it really say how much faster TA would be vs a traditional arbiter with an SSD/NVME sitting right next to the cluster on the same gluster network.

The docs do imply it was primarily designed for the out of band case you mentioned.

I was just curious if anyone had any real world experience and if it was considered stable and seems to work as advertised. I would so some testing on it.

-wk


On 12/19/2020 9:50 AM, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
You already mentioned that regular arbiter works fine for you .

What are the considerations to switch from regular to thin arbiter ?

I think that thin arbiter is suitable for environments where a third node is not possible locally and is a compromise in order to avoid 'replica 2' volumes.


Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov






В петък, 18 декември 2020 г., 23:54:59 Гринуич+2, WK <wkmail@xxxxxxxxx> написа:











OK, so it seems 8.x is the way to go

So what about Thin Arbiter?

Is anyone one using it in production?


-wk








On 12/18/2020 12:59 AM, Olaf Buitelaar wrote:


It is in their release notes; https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/7.9/



Ok, we've usually good experiences with inplace update's. But taking the safe route is always a good idea!



Op do 17 dec. 2020 om 19:49 schreef WK <wkmail@xxxxxxxxx>:


On 12/17/2020 10:13 AM, Olaf Buitelaar wrote:
Hi WK,

i believe gluster 7 just received it's
latest maintenance patch @version 7.9. so that's a dead end from there on.

Hmm, ok, the website should reflect that then.


I'm not sure if you can skip a whole version going straight to 8.
well it would be a forklift upgrade.

We build up new boxes and migrate over the data.

The one area we have been burned before on Gluster is doing in place
upgrades. Since we don't have all our eggs in one basket we can migrate
one cluster at a time that way.




________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux