Il 2020-11-26 09:47 Dmitry Antipov ha scritto:
On 11/26/20 11:29 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Can you details your exact client and server CPU model?
Desktop is 8x of:
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
Server is 32x of:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4110 CPU @ 2.10GHz
Your desktop CPU single-thread performance is significantly higher than
the server CPU: the former turbo to 3.5 GHz, while the latter only to
3.0 GHz. Moreover, for single-thread workloads Skylake client is 3-5%
faster than Skylake server at the same frequency.
So I think you simply are CPU limited. I remember doing some tests with
loopback RAM disks and finding that Gluster used 100% CPU (ie: full load
on an entire core) when doing 4K random writes. Side note: using
synchronized (ie: fsync) 4k writes, I only get ~600 IOPs even when
running both bricks on the same machine and backing them with RAM disks
(in other words, with no network or disk bottleneck).
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
________
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
