Re: Poor performance on a server-class system vs. desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Erm... that's not correct.
Put them on the same line
27.0.0.1   localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
> localhost4.localdomain4 trick.....

Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov

В 12:00 +0300 на 26.11.2020 (чт), Dmitry Antipov написа:
> On 11/26/20 11:42 AM, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> 
> > And you gluster bricks are localhost:/brick1 , localhost:/brick2
> > and
> > localhost:/brick3 ?
> > If not, add the hostname used for the bricks on the line starting
> > with
> > 127.0.0.1 and try again.
> 
> Same thing with:
> 
> 127.0.0.1   trick trick.localdomain trick4 trick4.localdomain4
> 127.0.0.1   localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
> localhost4.localdomain4
> ::1         localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6
> localhost6.localdomain6
> 
> and:
> 
> Volume Name: test0
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: 2699e6fd-3898-4912-b4de-2d3850c53fb9
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: trick:/glusterfs/test0-000
> Brick2: trick:/glusterfs/test0-001
> Brick3: trick:/glusterfs/test0-002
> 
> When running the workload, per-interface RX/TX counters (as shown by
> ifconfig)
> are rapidly grows on 'lo' but remains nearly the same on other
> interfaces.
> So I'm pretty sure that loopback is in action and the problem is
> somewhere else.
> 
> Dmitry

________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux