Re: State of Gluster project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> For NVMe/SSD  - raid controller is pointless ,  so JBOD makes  most sense.

I am game for an education lesson here. We're still using spinng drives
with big RAID caches but we keep discussing SSD in the context of RAID. I
have read for many real-world workloads, RAID0 makes no sense with
modern SSDs. I get that part. But if your concern is reliability and
reducing the need to mess with Gluster to recover from a drive failure,
a RAID1 or or RADI10 (or some other with redundancy) would seem to at
least make sense from that perspective.

Was your answer a performance answer? Or am I missing something about
RAIDs for redundancy and SSDs being a bad choice?

Thanks again as always,

Erik
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux