Re: MTU 9000 question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you !!!

We are going to try to run some experiments as well in the coming weeks.
Assuming I don't get re-routed, which often happens, I'll share if we
notice anything in our work load.

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 07:41:56PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> 
> 06.05.2020 19:15, Erik Jacobson пишет:
> > > It's been working pretty
> > > well at 1500 MTU so far. If the only issue is less throughput, that may
> > > be a price we can pay since we're not bandwidth bound right now.
> > > 
> 
> I think that fragmentation offload on nics makes jumbo frames not very
> useful.
> 
> As I said we see no difference in our workload, we switched nics to mtu 9000
> just because we can, but not from start,
> 
> and we did not see any improvements.
> 
> Gluster never saturates our teamed in two 10Gb connections nor with mtu 9000
> nor with 1500 and there is no visible latency difference.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux