Re: Performance is falling rapidly when updating from v5.5 to v7.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/4/19 8:46 PM, David Spisla wrote:
Dear Gluster Community,

I also have a issue concerning performance. The last days I updated our test cluster from GlusterFS v5.5 to v7.0 . The setup in general:

2 HP DL380 Servers with 10Gbit NICs, 1 Distribute-Replica 2 Volume with 2 Replica Pairs. Client is SMB Samba (access via vfs_glusterfs) . I did several tests to ensure that Samba don't causes the fall.
The setup ist completely the same except the Gluster Version
Here are my results:
64KiB           1MiB             10MiB            (Filesize)
3,49             47,41            300,50          (Values in MiB/s with GlusterFS v5.5)
0,16              2,61             76,63            (Values in MiB/s with GlusterFS v7.0)


Can you please share the profile information [1] for both versions?  Also it would be really helpful if you can mention the io patterns that used for this tests.

[1] : https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Monitoring%20Workload/


We use this volume options (GlusterFS 7.0):

Volume Name: archive1
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: 44c17844-0bd4-4ca2-98d8-a1474add790c
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: fs-dl380-c1-n1:/gluster/brick1/glusterbrick
Brick2: fs-dl380-c1-n2:/gluster/brick1/glusterbrick
Brick3: fs-dl380-c1-n1:/gluster/brick2/glusterbrick
Brick4: fs-dl380-c1-n2:/gluster/brick2/glusterbrick
Options Reconfigured:
performance.client-io-threads: off
nfs.disable: on
storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on
transport.address-family: inet
user.smb: disable
features.read-only: off
features.worm: off
features.worm-file-level: on
features.retention-mode: enterprise
features.default-retention-period: 120
network.ping-timeout: 10
features.cache-invalidation: on
features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
performance.nl-cache: on
performance.nl-cache-timeout: 600
client.event-threads: 32
server.event-threads: 32
cluster.lookup-optimize: on
performance.stat-prefetch: on
performance.cache-invalidation: on
performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
performance.cache-samba-metadata: on
performance.cache-ima-xattrs: on
performance.io-thread-count: 64
cluster.use-compound-fops: on
performance.cache-size: 512MB
performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 10
performance.read-ahead: off
performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB
performance.write-behind: on
storage.build-pgfid: on
features.ctime: on
cluster.quorum-type: fixed
cluster.quorum-count: 1
features.bitrot: on
features.scrub: Active
features.scrub-freq: daily

For GlusterFS 5.5 its nearly the same except the fact that there were 2 options to enable ctime feature.



Ctime stores additional metadata information as an extended attributes which sometimes exceeds the default inode size. In such scenarios the additional xattrs won't fit into the default size. This will result in additional blocks to be used to store xattrs in the inide, which will effect the latency. This is purely based on the i/o operations and the total xattrs size stored in the inode.

Is it possible for you to repeat the test by disabling ctime or increasing the inode size to a higher value say 1024KB?


Our optimization for Samba looks like this (for every version):

[global]
workgroup = SAMBA
netbios name = CLUSTER
kernel share modes = no
aio read size = 1
aio write size = 1
kernel oplocks = no
max open files = 100000
nt acl support = no
security = user
server min protocol = SMB2
store dos attributes = no
strict locking = no
full_audit:failure = pwrite_send pwrite_recv pwrite offload_write_send offload_write_recv create_file open unlink connect disconnect rename chown fchown lchown chmod fchmod mkdir rmdir ntimes ftruncate fallocate
full_audit:success = pwrite_send pwrite_recv pwrite offload_write_send offload_write_recv create_file open unlink connect disconnect rename chown fchown lchown chmod fchmod mkdir rmdir ntimes ftruncate fallocate
full_audit:facility = local5
durable handles = yes
posix locking = no
log level = 2
max log size = 100000
debug pid = yes

What can be the cause for this rapid falling of the performance for small files? Are some of our vol options not recommended anymore?
There were some patches concerning performance for small files in v6.0 und v7.0 :

#1670031: performance regression seen with smallfile workload tests

#1659327: 43% regression in small-file sequential read performance

And one patch for the io-cache:

#1659869: improvements to io-cache

Regards

David Spisla


________

Community Meeting Calendar:

APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/118564314

NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/118564314

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
________

Community Meeting Calendar:

APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/118564314

NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/118564314

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux