On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:24:53 +0530 Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy <avishwan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If Master and Slave Volumes are in > > > the same cluster then it is not so helpful when disaster happens. > > > > So, do I need to do something like this?: > > > > cluster volume name: gvol0 > > replication vol name: rep-gvol0 > > Volume names can be kept as your convenience. The doc is quite unclear for me as a gluster newbie. It's the old Linux paradox: the moment that you will understand the docs is the moment that you don't need them anymore. Why is there a MASTER_VOL and a SLAVE_VOL? If I have a volume called "gvol0" it seems logical to me that the geo-replication slave server also uses this volume name "gvol0". The geo-replication server knows it is not part of the active cluster because it was told to do so. OTOH, I think there must be an obvious reason for this MASTER_VOL and SLAVE_VOL, but I don't understand this from the docs. R. -- richard lucassen http://contact.xaq.nl/ _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
