Re: Gluster and bonding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



25.02.2019 14:43, Alex K пишет:
Hi All,

I was asking if it is possible to have the two separate cables connected to two different physical switched.


Yes, if these switches are in cluster, we use comware switches, so we use IRF, I guess cisco has lacp support on several switches in nexus..


When trying mode6 or mode1 in this setup gluster was refusing to start the volumes, giving me "transport endpoint is not connected".

server1: cable1 ---------------- switch1 --------------------- server2: cable1
                                            |
server1: cable2 ---------------- switch2 --------------------- server2: cable2

Both switches are connected with each other also. This is done to achieve redundancy for the switches.
When disconnecting cable2 from both servers, then gluster was happy.
What could be the problem?

If you need just redundancy, may be you can use STP? combine port in bridge.

Never tried this though, don't know how good is STP support in linux bridge...


btw, I don't think this is gluster problem, I think you have to ask in sort of linux networking list.




_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux