2017-10-10 18:27 GMT+02:00 Jeff Darcy <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Probably not. If there is, it would probably favor XFS. The developers > at Red Hat use XFS almost exclusively. We at Facebook have a mix, but > XFS is (I think) the most common. Whatever the developers use tends to > become "the way local filesystems work" and code is written based on > that profile, so even without intention that tends to get a bit of a > boost. To the extent that ZFS makes different tradeoffs - e.g. using > lots more memory, very different disk access patterns - it's probably > going to have a bit more of an "impedance mismatch" with the choices > Gluster itself has made. Ok, so XFS is the way to go :) _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
