Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry, I already destroyed 3.12.0 and servers are in production with 3.10.5.

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
<pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Serkan,
>         Will it be possible to provide gluster volume profile <volname> info
> output with 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0? That should give us clues about what could be
> happening.
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Serkan Çoban <cobanserkan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Servers are in production with 3.10.5, so I cannot provide 3.12
>> related information anymore.
>> Thanks for help, sorry for inconvenience.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux