Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
From: Serkan Çoban <cobanserkan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:21:15 +0300
Cc: Gluster Users <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <e2ac8967-5daf-d0de-8514-ef6aed6911d9@redhat.com>
References: <CAP9WWecog_Yvxr7qRqWmurBmCy01MpDUkkD=fzmEcRMFgTRamA@mail.gmail.com> <8729015e-b747-a308-2f07-725493d92da2@redhat.com> <CAP9WWecikR9T6jcQsq-3YOqhujcjFfc-gUKE6Kp6aTZCDmgHzw@mail.gmail.com> <e2ac8967-5daf-d0de-8514-ef6aed6911d9@redhat.com>

Hi,
Servers are in production with 3.10.5, so I cannot provide 3.12
related information anymore.
Thanks for help, sorry for inconvenience.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
  - From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri

References:
- 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
  - From: Serkan Çoban
- Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
  - From: Shyam Ranganathan
- Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
  - From: Serkan Çoban
- Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
  - From: Shyam Ranganathan

Prev by Date: Re: Slow performance of gluster volume
Next by Date: one brick one volume process dies?
Previous by thread: Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
Next by thread: Re: 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Development] [Linux Filesytems Development] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux